Skip to content ↓

MIT economist Joshua Angrist shares Nobel Prize

Cited for work building the foundations of “natural experiments” in economic research, Angrist is honored along with David Card and Guido Imbens.
Press Inquiries

Press Contact:

Kimberly Allen
Phone: 617-253-2702
Fax: 617-258-8762
MIT News Office

Media Download

Portrait photo of Joshua Angrist at his home, standing in front of a window
Download Image
Caption: MIT economist and Nobel laureate Joshua Angrist
Credits: Photo: Lillie Paquette
Joshua Angrist hugs his wife, Mira Angrist, in their kitchen
Download Image
Caption: MIT economist and Nobel laureate Joshua Angrist celebrates at home with his wife Mira Angrist, a professor at Boston University.
Credits: Photo: Lillie Paquette
Joshua Angrist sitting at his desk, videochatting on his smartphone
Download Image
Caption: Joshua Angrist celebrates the news about his Nobel Prize.
Credits: Photo: Lillie Paquette
Joshua Angrist, holding his young granddaughter and standing next to his wife, on the steps outside their home, with photographers in the foreground
Download Image
Caption: Joshua Angrist, with Mira Angrist and their granddaughter Bella, outside their home
Credits: Photo: Lillie Paquette
Joshua Angrist and his son Noam Angrist at home standing in front of a window
Download Image
Caption: Joshua Angrist, on the right, with his son Noam Angrist ’13
Credits: Photo: Lillie Paquette
Portrait photo of Joshua Angrist standing in front of a bookshelf
Download Image
Caption: Joshua Angrist is the Ford International Professor of Economics at MIT.
Credits: Photo courtesy of the MIT Department of Economics
Headshot of Joshua Angrist
Download Image
Caption: Joshua Angrist is the Ford International Professor of Economics at MIT.
Credits: Photo courtesy of the MIT Department of Economics

*Terms of Use:

Images for download on the MIT News office website are made available to non-commercial entities, press and the general public under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license. You may not alter the images provided, other than to crop them to size. A credit line must be used when reproducing images; if one is not provided below, credit the images to "MIT."

Close
Portrait photo of Joshua Angrist at his home, standing in front of a window
Caption:
MIT economist and Nobel laureate Joshua Angrist
Credits:
Photo: Lillie Paquette
Joshua Angrist hugs his wife, Mira Angrist, in their kitchen
Caption:
MIT economist and Nobel laureate Joshua Angrist celebrates at home with his wife Mira Angrist, a professor at Boston University.
Credits:
Photo: Lillie Paquette
Joshua Angrist sitting at his desk, videochatting on his smartphone
Caption:
Joshua Angrist celebrates the news about his Nobel Prize.
Credits:
Photo: Lillie Paquette
Joshua Angrist, holding his young granddaughter and standing next to his wife, on the steps outside their home, with photographers in the foreground
Caption:
Joshua Angrist, with Mira Angrist and their granddaughter Bella, outside their home
Credits:
Photo: Lillie Paquette
Joshua Angrist and his son Noam Angrist at home standing in front of a window
Caption:
Joshua Angrist, on the right, with his son Noam Angrist ’13
Credits:
Photo: Lillie Paquette

MIT labor economist Joshua D. Angrist, whose influential work has enhanced rigorous empirical research in economics, has been named a winner of the 2021 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. Angrist shares half the award with Guido Imbens of the Stanford Graduate School of Business; the other half goes to David Card of the University of California at Berkeley. All three scholars have long collaborated to upgrade empirical research in the field.

“I’m overwhelmed,” Angrist told MIT News after being notified about the award this morning. “Everybody lucky enough to win the Nobel Prize is gratified and honored. I’m especially lucky to be sharing this honor with David Card and Guido Imbens.”

Angrist was cited for his work establishing new methods of conducting “natural experiments” in economics — studies using data in which otherwise similar groups of people are separated by crucial variables, allowing researchers to better understand cause and effect in complex social situations.

Natural experiments, as the Nobel citation states, are “a rich source of knowledge. Their research has substantially improved our ability to answer key causal questions, which has been of great benefit to society.” For example, a change in government policy — regarding school districts, health care, wage levels, and more — can create situations in which natural experiments become a logical way of understanding the effects that ensue.

However, drawing robust conclusions from such data is rarely simple, and Angrist has worked extensively to develop the scholarly tools needed to find firm results. The Nobel citation emphasizes the influence of a 1994 paper that Angrist and Imbens co-wrote, “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects,” published in the journal Econometrica. That paper formalizes the idea that the average effect of something — be it a new government policy, wage increase, military service, or educational attainment — is best measured by its impact on people who normally never would have experienced it.

In addition to his methodological work, Angrist has conducted his own empirical research that delves deeply into issues of employment and education, bringing light — and hard data — to matters such as the effects of education and military service on lifetime earnings, and the impact of class size and many kinds of policy experiments on educational outcomes.

“I think it’s great recognition for empirical economics,” Angrist added, about receiving the Nobel Prize. “I think this is further evidence that economics has matured greatly as an empirical discipline. Our work has become better, more convincing, and more relevant, in  policy discussions and to families making decisions.”

Angrist also emphasized how beneficial it has been for him to call MIT home for the last quarter-century.

“I have felt very lucky to be working at MIT,” Angrist said. “It’s a wonderful environment. I have the best colleagues any economist could hope to have, and wonderful students. I look forward to teaching class again on Tuesday morning — I’m teaching labor economics at 10:30.”

Forging his own path to success

Angrist, who grew up in Pittsburgh, traveled a slightly winding road to academic success, at least by Nobel standards. He left high school after the 11th grade, having met his graduation requirements, and worked in a state mental hospital before deciding to attend college. Angrist then received a BA in economics from Oberlin College in 1982. After initially starting and then leaving one graduate program in economics, Angrist earned his MA and PhD in economics from Princeton University, in 1987 and 1989, respectively.

After receiving his doctorate, Angrist was an assistant professor at Harvard University for two years and a faculty member at Hebrew University until 1996, when he joined the MIT faculty. Angrist has been the Ford International Professor of Economics at MIT since 2008.

At Princeton, where his principal advisor was economist Orley Ashenfelter, Angrist began conducting the empirical research that has been his hallmark. Angrist’s doctoral thesis examined the effects of compulsory military service in Vietnam on workplace outcomes, finding that it generally lowered cumulative earnings. Card, then at Princeton, also served as one of Angrist’s graduate school advisors.

In 1991, Angrist and the late economist Alan Krueger published a paper on the relationship between education and lifetime earnings that has since appeared in many textbooks as a classic example of a natural experiment. Using varying state laws about the age at which students could drop out of school, Angrist and Krueger examined decades of data, going back to the 1920s, and found that an additional year of education was worth about 7.5 percent more in annual earnings.

Angrist and Imbens continued to collaborate after their seminal 1994 Econometrica paper, co-authoring several other published papers on the methods of empirical research.

“David was a great advisor to me,” Angrist told MIT News. “Guido and I set off on a journey 30 years ago to investigate our ideas and find out what we could learn from natural experiments and instrumental variables.”

And while methodological debates in the discipline have sometimes been heated, Angrist has been steadfast in his support of empiricism. As Card told MIT News in 2013, speaking of Angrist, “One of the secrets of his success is his tenacity.”

Glenn Ellison, the Gregory K. Palm Professor and head of MIT’s Department of Economics, said, “It's an honor to have been Josh's colleague for the past 25 years. Over the past three decades Angrist and Imbens have substantially altered the course of the economics profession. They have changed how economists think about causality, shifted the focus of applied research to pay more and more careful attention to causal effects, and changed the practice of econometrics.”

Ellison added: “Josh has had a tremendous impact on many undergraduate and graduate students over the past quarter-century. He has invested tremendously in teaching as well as research.”

Agustín Rayo, the interim dean of MIT’s School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, said the school is “delighted and proud to celebrate Joshua Angrist’s economics research today. Josh has had a transformative effect on our ability to establish causal relationships in the real world, allowing us to understand what sorts of interventions would actually be effective in carrying out policy goals. His work on natural experiments has enormously expanded the range of questions that economists can address and answer, leading to insights about many issues in human society. This work embodies the deep commitment in our school, and around the Institute, to the revolutionary potential of basic research. On behalf of the entire school community, I wish him — and his co-winners David Card and Guido Imbens — our warmest congratulations.”

In introductory remarks at an online press conference this morning, MIT Provost Martin A. Schmidt noted that “Professor Angrist’s work examining the effects of real-world economic circumstances and social policies is a proud reminder of MIT’s commitment to bring knowledge to bear on the world’s most pressing issues.”

Cool tools and central research questions

Beyond his primary research, Angrist has served as an enthusiastic advocate of rigorous empirical economics. With Jörn-Steffen Pischke, he has co-authored multiple books about the many methods that can be deployed to conduct natural experiments and extract sharpened, “lab-grade” conclusions from existing datasets.

Angrist has long emphasized that natural experiments and other recently fashioned empirical tools are not ends in themselves. All the newer methods of empirical research, he believes, are best when attached to vital social issues.

“It’s the combination of a cool tool applied to a central question that leads to good research,” Angrist told MIT News in 2013.

School performance is among the questions that has been central to Angrist’s recent research. In 2012, Angrist, along with MIT economists David Autor and Parag Pathak, founded MIT’s School Effectiveness and Inequality Initiative, to study a wide range of questions about educational approaches and outcomes. The initiative was just renamed Blueprint Labs in 2021.

Angrist continues doing research at full speed, and not only about education. One 2020 paper he co-authored turned the empirical lens on economics itself; Angrist and his colleagues found that the portion of papers based on empirical research — as opposed to theory or methodology — has increased by about 20 percentage points since 1990.

Angrist has published over 50 peer-reviewed papers in economics and written dozens of review articles and book chapters. The two books he has written with Pischke are “Mostly Harmless Econometrics” (2009) and “Mastering ’Metrics” (2015). Angrist was elected a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2006.

Angrist has been widely cited in economics for much of his career, and in recent decades has been increasingly cited in other disciplines. Ellison, a co-author of the 2020 paper on trends in the economics publishing, says that Angrist and his colleagues have “inspired a generation of scholars, not only in economics, but also in education, biostatistics, epidemiology, and political science, to think lucidly and precisely about identifying causal effects in nonlaboratory settings.”

For his part, Angrist told MIT News, “We’re gratified our work has been so widely used. That’s the scholar’s greatest reward. The Nobel Prize is the icing on the cake.”

Angrist is the eighth person to win the award while serving as an MIT faculty member, following Paul Samuelson (1970), Franco Modigliani (1985), Robert Solow (1987), Peter Diamond (2010), Bengt Holmström (2016), and Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo (2019). Twelve MIT alumni have won the Nobel Prize in economics; eight former faculty have also won the award.

Press Mentions

Freakonomics Radio

Prof. Joshua Angrist speaks with Freakonomics Radio host Stephen Dubner about the influence of his work on public policy. “I like to influence public policy. And I’m happy when I influence public policy, but that is not what I get up in the morning and set out to do,” says Angrist. “I’m an academic, and what I set out to do is high-quality scholarship. I like to get things published in top journals. That’s how I measure my influence. Now, ultimately, a lot of the work I do does affect public policy, or at least it becomes part of the discussion, and that’s gratifying.”

The Nobel Podcast

Prof. Joshua Angrist speaks with The Nobel Podcast host Adam Smith about his career in economics and how winning the Nobel Prize has impacted his life. “I never stop thinking about my work,” says Angrist.

Freakonomics Radio

Prof. Joshua Angrist speaks with Steven D. Levitt about natural experiments, the Talmud, and his path to winning the 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics on the Freakonomics Radio Network's podcast, People I (Mostly) Admire. “Natural experiments started to attract people like me, partly because it was interesting and fun, and we had the opportunity to actually say something concrete about the world,” said Angrist.

GBH

Prof. Jon Gruber speaks with Jared Bowen and Jim Braude of GBH about his colleague and former thesis advisor Prof. Joshua Angrist, who recently was awarded a Nobel Prize in Economics. “I don’t think I’ve ever been more excited over someone’s professional accomplishment as I’ve been for Josh to win this award. It’s just incredibly exciting,” says Gruber.

The Economist

Prof. Joshua Angrist, one of the winners of the 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics, speaks with Rachana Shanbhogue of The Economist’s Money Talks podcast about the evolution of his research and how his work has helped bring the field of economics closer to real life. “I like to tell graduate students that a good scholar is like a good hitter in baseball,” says Angrist of his advice for economics students. “You get on base about a third of the time you’re doing pretty well, which means you strike out most of the time.”

Reuters

Prof. Joshua Angrist, Prof. David Card of the University of California at Berkeley and Prof. Guido Imbens of Stanford have been awarded the 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics for “pioneering ‘natural experiments’ to show real-world economic impacts,” reports Simon Johnson and Niklas Pollard for Reuters. “The Nobel committee noted that natural experiments were difficult to interpret, but that Angrist and Imbens had, in the mid-1990s, solved methodological problems to show that precise conclusions about cause and effect could be drawn from them,” write Johnson and Pollard.

Financial Times

Prof. Joshua Angrist has been named one of the winners of this year’s Nobel Prize in Economics for his work developing “a framework showing how precise conclusions about cause and effect could be drawn from natural experiments,” reports Delphine Strauss for the Financial Times. “The committee said this had ‘transformed’ applied work, and was now widely used in economics, and increasingly in other social sciences, epidemiology and medicine,” writes Strauss.

The Boston Globe

Prof. Joshua Angrist was named a winner of the 2021 Nobel Prize for Economics for “a body of work stretching across decades that has sought to answer the complex questions at the crux of modern political discussion through the lens of proven research,” writes Andrew Brinker for The Boston Globe. “It’s just the greatest honor a person could have,” said Angrist. “It’s a high point of my life.”

Associated Press

The Associated Press spotlights the work of Prof. Joshua Angrist, one of the winners of the 2021 Nobel Prize for Economics. Angrist was honored “for working out the methodological issues that allow economists to draw solid conclusions about cause and effect even where they cannot carry out studies according to strict scientific methods.” Of winning a Nobel prize, Angrist said, “I can hardly believe it. It's only been a few hours and I am still trying to absorb it."

New York Times

New York Times reporter Jeanna Smialek explores the work of Prof. Joshua Angrist, who was honored as a recipient of the 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics for his work developing “research tools that help economists use real-life situations to test big theories, like how additional education affects earnings.” Angrist and his fellow recipients David Card and Guido Imbens “ushered in a new phase in labor economics that has now reached all fields of the profession,” said Prof. Trevon D. Logan of Ohio State.

The Wall Street Journal

Wall Street Journal reporters Paul Hannon and David Harrison write that Prof. Joshua Angrist, who won the 2021 Nobel Prize in Economics along with David Card and Guido Imbens, “helped economists make better use of natural experiments, in which some people are randomly subjected to a policy while others aren’t.” Says Angrist of his work: “Whereas the generation that I’m part of and associated with the credibility revolution, we entered the arena with specific questions in mind and then we had a strategy for answering that question using this idea of natural experiments.”

Related Links

Related Topics

Related Articles

More MIT News