Skip to content ↓

Ties with MIT run deep for the US Navy’s top officer

Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89 poses global challenges to academe.
Press Inquiries

Press Contact:

Meg Murphy
Phone: 617-715-4339
School of Engineering
Close
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89 is the senior four-star admiral leading the U.S. Navy. He outlined the challenges ahead for the Navy and invited solutions during an MIT symposium in honor of one of his mentors, Alan Oppenheim, an MIT Ford Professor of Engineering.
Caption:
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89 is the senior four-star admiral leading the U.S. Navy. He outlined the challenges ahead for the Navy and invited solutions during an MIT symposium in honor of one of his mentors, Alan Oppenheim, an MIT Ford Professor of Engineering.
Credits:
Photo: Gretchen Ertl
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89, addresses the crew of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt in the Arabian Gulf. His position as chief of naval operations places him on the Joint Chiefs of Staff as adviser to the secretary of defense and the president.
Caption:
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89, addresses the crew of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt in the Arabian Gulf. His position as chief of naval operations places him on the Joint Chiefs of Staff as adviser to the secretary of defense and the president.
Credits:
Photo: Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Spencer Roberts / U.S. Navy
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89 talks with sailors at a Marine Corps Air Station in Iwakuni, Japan. “As a graduate student, John clearly stood out as brilliant, a leader, and wonderfully warm and friendly,” says Alan Oppenheim, an MIT Ford Professor of Engineering. “It is so striking that through his ascendancy in the Navy, John never lost thes...
Caption:
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89 talks with sailors at a Marine Corps Air Station in Iwakuni, Japan. “As a graduate student, John clearly stood out as brilliant, a leader, and wonderfully warm and friendly,” says Alan Oppenheim, an MIT Ford Professor of Engineering. “It is so striking that through his ascendancy in the Navy, John never lost these professional and personal qualities. He is as approachable today as he was back then.”
Credits:
Photo: Chief Mass Communication Specialist Elliott Fabrizio / U.S. Navy
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89 is greeted by Captain Ryan Scholl, commanding officer of aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman. Richardson envisions U.S. naval power rising as the fleet grows deeply networked with the assistance of technologies such as artificial intelligence, human and machine teams, and quantum computing.
Caption:
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89 is greeted by Captain Ryan Scholl, commanding officer of aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman. Richardson envisions U.S. naval power rising as the fleet grows deeply networked with the assistance of technologies such as artificial intelligence, human and machine teams, and quantum computing.
Credits:
Photo: Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class K. H. Anderson / U.S. Navy

Looking back on his MIT graduate student days in the late 1980s, Admiral John M. Richardson SM ’89, EE ’89, ENG ’89 recalls a quieter time. He was not yet helming the world’s most powerful navy nor was global competition at sea nearly so high.

Richardson is now the chief of naval operations (CNO), the senior four-star admiral leading the U.S. Navy. This position places him on the Joint Chiefs of Staff as adviser to the secretary of defense and the president. He draws on his deep ties to academe to help the Navy keep pace.

From his graduate student days to today what has remained unchanged are the depth of his attachment to MIT and the warmth and respect between Richardson and his mentors in the MIT-Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program.

“As a graduate student, John clearly stood out as brilliant, a leader, and wonderfully warm and friendly,” says Alan Oppenheim, an MIT Ford Professor of Engineering.

After his time at MIT and Woods Hole, Richardson went on to command the submarine USS Honolulu, a ship known in the Navy for the important missions for which it was tasked. Before that command he was posted at the White House as President Clinton’s Navy adviser. Just before being selected to be the CNO he was in charge of all of the nuclear reactor technology in the Navy.

“It is so striking that through his ascendancy in the Navy, John never lost these professional and personal qualities. He is as approachable today as he was back then,” Oppenheim says.

The power of relationships

Richardson recently took time from his schedule to articulate the significance of MIT in his life and career. He says friendships that began during graduate work quickly expanded to bluefish barbeques, bike riding, wind surfing, and listening to jazz and country music together, and many other things that “we still share even 30 years later.”

He speaks with affection of strong relationships with academics such as Oppenheim and Arthur Baggeroer, an MIT professor of mechanical, ocean, and electrical engineering and a Ford Professor of Engineering, Emeritus. “What I value most about my time at MIT are the enduring relationships with amazing people. Al, Art, and so many others have enriched my life so much — they are my mentors, my senseis.”

Richardson insists other alumni have made what he describes as “far more important contributions to the field of engineering.” And says for his part, he’s been able to apply his time at MIT to leading the Navy.

“In the end, it’s all about making our sailors the best in the world,” Richardson says. “The Navy that I'm so privileged to lead has always used world-leading technology, brought to life by our partnership with academe. MIT has always been a bright star in that constellation of innovation and excellence.” 

More like a family reunion

Richardson recalls a fall 2017 symposium about the future of signal processing in honor of Oppenheim, a pioneer in the field. “I'll never forget the warm feelings of camaraderie that defined Al’s conference on the future of signal processing and 80th birthday celebration.” He describes himself as “super nervous” after accepting the invitation to speak because he knew “the world’s best would be there to listen.”

“All of that anxiety was instantly dispelled by the love and respect Al engenders in others, and that will always be part of his legacy. We all felt like family by our association with him and MIT,” Richardson says.

At the symposium, the admiral outlined the challenges ahead for the Navy and invited solutions. “I want to share with you my problems to provide a template for those of you all with solutions,” he said, standing in full dress uniform. “This is a continuation of a great tradition that we have between the Navy and MIT.”

The Navy faced a submarine problem in the Atlantic during World War II that MIT helped solve through a rigorous application of emerging science in operations research, he said. “Academe came to our rescue there.”

The same was true for the Battle of Britain, during which MIT-developed naval anti-aircraft technology played a pivotal role in beating back large-scale attacks by Nazi Germany. “We have a long tradition of working together.”

Among other things, MIT has a long-standing Graduate Program in Naval Construction and Marine Engineering in close cooperation with the Navy dating back to 1901. The 2N program combines cutting-edge technical initiatives with practical design and prepares U.S. Navy, U.S. Coast Guard, foreign naval officers, and other graduate students for careers in ships design and construction.

Challenges in the maritime

The traffic on the ocean has increased by a factor of four over the past 25 years, Richardson said to a packed room during the conference on the future of signal processing. “Just picture that curve in your mind. The amount of food we get from the sea has increased by more than a factor of 10 in the same time period.”

“The Arctic ice cap is the smallest it has been since we started taking measurements and getting smaller, and that has tremendous implications for traffic routes and access to resources,” he said.

The internet of things will include 30 billion devices connected by 2020. And 99 percent of web data rides on undersea cables on the sea floor. “It’s not about a cloud, it’s about the ocean,” said Richardson. “If cables are disturbed or disrupted, you can’t reconstitute that via satellites or anything else, you can only fight back and get about two percent.”

“Things are moving very quickly. It’s very competitive. We’ve done a lot of work to try and figure out — how should the Navy respond?” he said. Multiple analyses show a need for heightened naval capability. Yet even the most aggressive shipbuilding plan equates to reaching 350 ships in about 17 years.

In his presentation, Richardson pointed to a chart with icons representing the U.S. fleet: ships, satellites, submarines, and aircraft. Let’s redefine the axis, he said. The measure of naval capability no longer rests only on the numerical metric of physical things but also on the ability to network platforms and to manage information.

“Signal processing has a terrific and important role in helping us transcend just making more ships. We must make our ships – and our Navy – more capable as well,” said Richardson. He pointed to a new graph in which U.S. naval power rises beyond exponential curves as the fleet is deeply networked with the assistance of technologies such as artificial intelligence, human and machine teams, and quantum computing.

Drawing on academe

More recently, Richardson created Task Force Ocean, which seeks to link innovative research concepts with the needs of the U.S. Navy, especially undersea forces. The senior academic involved in these Navy efforts is Arthur Baggeroer.

“I have known every chief of naval operations over the last two decades, and John is by far the most engaged with academia,” says Baggeroer, who was the director of the MIT-WHOI program when Richardson enrolled in 1985. He also acted as academic advisor to Richardson and five additional naval officers in the program.

Over the years, Baggeroer kept up with Richardson as he rose through the ranks.

“He has been very supportive of the MIT-WHOI Joint Program and has taken steps to attract to the program younger officers with the same qualifications he had at the time,” adds Baggeroer. 

Setting a high bar

Richardson was, by all accounts, a star graduate student. His career track and leadership continue to inspire Navy students, says Tim Stanton, scientist emeritus at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. He joined Oppenheim as Richardson’s thesis advisor.

“Admiral Richardson sets the gold standard for excellence and leadership in the Navy,” says Stanton. “As I advised many Navy students for the nearly 30 years after Admiral Richardson graduated, they frequently referenced his leadership as a benchmark for their career goals. Through his leadership, he not only directly impacted Navy operations, but also the next generation of leaders in the Navy.”

“I’m so grateful for the continued friendship, partnership and leadership of MIT with the Navy,” says Richardson. “MIT has had an amazing impact on me and my life. It literally changed the way I think about things.”

Related Links

Related Topics

Related Articles

More MIT News

Kunal Singh stands before a silver missile in a room with a flat screen behind him

Stopping the bomb

Political science PhD student Kunal Singh identifies a suite of strategies states use to prevent other nations from developing nuclear weapons.

Read full story