MIT Sloan School of Management

A new paper co-authored by Prof. Anna Stansbury examines how socioeconomic differences can impact first-generation college students after graduation, writes Noam Scheiber for The New York Times. Stansbury and her colleagues found that having a parent with a graduate degree reflected a “generalized socioeconomic advantage.” Growing up affluent often “helps you learn how to read between the lines in certain situations, because you’ve been in similar kinds of situations,” Stansbury explains. 

Prof. Gary Gensler joins CNBC’s “Squawk Box” to discuss the AI race and shares his suggestions for government regulations. “I do feel that there’s a need for more responsible regulation of artificial intelligence,” says Gensler. “These existential risks [conflicts of interest, explainability, and bias], however you measure them, are much harder to control because you’ve got the competition between Chinese model developers, [and] U.S. model developers.”  

The MIT Sloan School of Management’s MBA program is ranked No. 1 in Quacquarelli Symonds’ 2027 list of Global MBA offerings, write reporters Louie Brand and Mustafa Mitashar. “U.S. business schools dominate the very top of the table,” note Brand and Mitashar. MIT Sloan “also leads employability with [a score of] 98.6.”  

Prof. Kristin Forbes speaks to Associated Press reporter Christopher Rugaber about the continued impact of the Iran war on oil and gas prices in the U.S.. “I don't see any end to the war in Iran right now,” says Forbes. “Given what everyone has been through in the last few years of high inflation, consumers are more sensitive, companies are more sensitive, they raise prices faster ... The risks are much more on more persistent inflation than it falling quickly.”  

Prof. John Sterman speaks with The Boston Globe Editorial Board about the potential impacts of AI on a variety of fields. The Editorial Board writes that Sterman sees “outcomes where AI can be harnessed to solve societal problems such as climate change, but, he said, first and foremost, that will take smarter government policies and incentives. A new simulator he helped develop, En-ROADS, allows users to explore AI’s potential impacts on climate change, positive and negative, depending on which path we choose.” 

In his latest book, “Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment,” Prof. Emeritus Paul Osterman finds that 35% of the U.S. workforce is made up of disposable workers hired with the “implicit understanding that they won’t be around for long,” writes Fortune’s Nick Lichtenberg. Employers “do not invest in the great bulk of their workforce” in the way that they used to, says Osterman.  

MIT researchers found that users preferred to consult professionals over AI chatbots, except when they are feeling embarrassment or shame, writes Forbes’ Joe McKendrick. “When we seek advice from other people, we’re often reluctant to share embarrassing details because we have a fear of being judged,” the researchers write. “People are more likely to turn to AI models to get professional advice when they’re embarrassed, because the model doesn’t judge them.” 

MIT researchers are leading a new project documenting what major AI systems say about elections in an effort to understand how the technology influences the democratic process, writes Tiffany Hsu for The New York Times. “AI is becoming part of the way people encounter and make sense of political information, and yet we know relatively little about what that information environment actually looks like, how it differs for different user demographics, political identities and geographies,” says Prof. Chara Podimata, a leader of the project.  

Sloan Senior Lecturer Jonathan Ruane joins Carmel Crimmins, host of Reuters’ “Econ World,” to discuss the future of quantum computing. “By 2035 I would not be surprised if you’re seeing some elements of the economy—whether that be firms within drug research for example, using, for certain applications, quantum computers as part of their overall process,” says Ruane.  

For The Next Big Idea Club, Prof. Paul Osterman outlines the pillars of his new book, “Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment.” “The rise of disposable work is allowing companies to gain flexibility and cut costs while shedding responsibility for their workers,” writes Osterman. “We need guardrails to keep that flexibility from coming at the expense of workers and the public.” 

Prof. Gary Gensler joins Bloomberg’s “Sustainability Currents and Votes and Verdicts” to discuss how the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can manage investor protection, capital formation and fair, orderly and efficient markets. “I would say [to the SEC], make sure that the US treasury market is functioning really well,” says Gensler. “Move forward with the treasury market reforms that were bipartisan. Keep making sure that the equity market is efficient. Keep making sure that we’re the world’s leading equity market.” 

Prof. Paul Osterman speaks to Fortune’s Nick Lichtenberg about how his new book “Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment” explores how a perceived lack of ambition among Gen Z reflects the decreased amount of job security and opportunity available to young workers. “No one has job security anymore, but these folks [disposable workers] are hired with that expectation and are not going to be around for long,” says Osterman.

Prof. Anna Stansbury speaks to the Financial Times’ Myles McCormick about a new study that found that chief executives at America’s largest low-wage employers had seen their pay rise 41 percent between 2019 and 2025, while the median worker earned 21 percent more income. “There’s been for several decades a shift in the balance of power from labor to capital in the US,” says Stansbury. “It seems unlikely that what’s happening now...can be used to infer a big secular shift in power beyond the ongoing steady trend that we’ve been seeing for a long time.”  

Sloan Senior Lecturer Paul Cheek’s new book, “No One Works Here” is outlined by Forbes’ Joe McKendrick. “The companies that are most likely to fall behind their peers are the ones that insist on keeping a human in the loop for decisions that a machine could have made yesterday,” Cheek writes in his book.  

A 2025 report by MIT researchers found that 62% of accounting professionals worry about errors in AI generated outputs, writes Thomson Reuters. “AI is doing real, meaningful work in tax workflows right now with even greater capabilities coming. But it’s also generating real anxiety,” Thomson Reuters notes.