For The Next Big Idea Club, Prof. Paul Osterman outlines the pillars of his new book, “Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment.” “The rise of disposable work is allowing companies to gain flexibility and cut costs while shedding responsibility for their workers,” writes Osterman. “We need guardrails to keep that flexibility from coming at the expense of workers and the public.”
Prof. Gary Gensler joins Bloomberg’s “Sustainability Currents and Votes and Verdicts” to discuss how the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can manage investor protection, capital formation and fair, orderly and efficient markets. “I would say [to the SEC], make sure that the US treasury market is functioning really well,” says Gensler. “Move forward with the treasury market reforms that were bipartisan. Keep making sure that the equity market is efficient. Keep making sure that we’re the world’s leading equity market.”
Prof. Paul Osterman speaks to Fortune’s Nick Lichtenberg about how his new book “Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment” explores how a perceived lack of ambition among Gen Z reflects the decreased amount of job security and opportunity available to young workers. “No one has job security anymore, but these folks [disposable workers] are hired with that expectation and are not going to be around for long,” says Osterman.
Prof. Anna Stansbury speaks to the Financial Times’ Myles McCormick about a new study that found that chief executives at America’s largest low-wage employers had seen their pay rise 41 percent between 2019 and 2025, while the median worker earned 21 percent more income. “There’s been for several decades a shift in the balance of power from labor to capital in the US,” says Stansbury. “It seems unlikely that what’s happening now...can be used to infer a big secular shift in power beyond the ongoing steady trend that we’ve been seeing for a long time.”
Sloan Senior Lecturer Paul Cheek’s new book, “No One Works Here” is outlined by Forbes’ Joe McKendrick. “The companies that are most likely to fall behind their peers are the ones that insist on keeping a human in the loop for decisions that a machine could have made yesterday,” Cheek writes in his book.
A 2025 report by MIT researchers found that 62% of accounting professionals worry about errors in AI generated outputs, writes Thomson Reuters. “AI is doing real, meaningful work in tax workflows right now with even greater capabilities coming. But it’s also generating real anxiety,” Thomson Reuters notes.
The Financial Times’ Anjana Ahuja spotlights research led by Prof. Dennis Whyte on the economics of fusion energy. “Economic Q, the metric devised by Whyte and others and which must exceed one to represent net economic gain, compares the capital gained over a fusion energy plant’s lifetime to that expended,” writes Ahuja. “Factors reflect the extreme engineering involved and include construction costs, component durability and the efficiency of converting fusion power into a commodity.”
Forbes’ Satya Krishnaswamy highlights a study co-authored by Lawrence Schmidt, a research affiliate at Sloan, that found AI can contribute to growth in certain roles where workers focus on higher-value tasks. “Schmidt’s research found that increased AI use was linked to both employment and sales growth,” writes Krishnaswamy.
MIT researchers have found that AI search features are unevenly distributed worldwide, and can sometimes share misleading information about images, writes Forbes’ Hastimal Jangid. “These incidents are important reminders that systems are only as good as the data they're trained on and that the long tail of data documenting the physical world is still being filled in,” writes Jangid.
Forbes’ Bryan Robinson highlights Prof. Paul Osterman’s new book, “Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment,” and identifies what constitutes disposable work. “We’re not becoming a gig economy; we’re becoming a disposable one,” says Osterman. “Marginal workers are employees who have no career prospects at their organizations.”
Prof. Emilio J. Castilla speaks to Forbes’ Lauren Russell about how bias can shape employee performance reviews. “Bias—whether explicit or unconscious—can potentially shape employment decisions at every stage, from who is interviewed and hired to who is promoted and who is rewarded for excellent performance,” says Castilla.
Writing for WBUR, Prof. Christopher Knittel and Visiting Prof. Gilbert Metcalf discuss implementing a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax for electric vehicles, instead of the flat annual fee of $130 recently proposed by Congress. “A flat EV tax does not differentiate between high-mileage and low-mileage drivers — a VMT tax does,” write Knittel and Metcalf. “It links payments to actual road use, which is precisely what proponents of EV fees, including the Bipartisan Policy Center and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, say they want.”
In a study of developers using GitHub Copilot, MIT researchers found AI shifted time away from teamwork and toward coding, writes Forbes’ Sarah Davis. “If AI reduces the need to ask colleagues for help and advice, workplaces become the mechanism for creating human interactions that promote connection and knowledge sharing,” writes Davis.
Prof. Kristin Forbes speaks to Bloomberg’s Daniel Moss about how governments can prepare to restore inflation targets in the event of a prolonged miss and highlights the value of providing a clear timeline. “You don’t want to be responsible for hitting a target each month when a global shock will veer you off course,” says Forbes. “It’s about the direction of inflation, the path.”
Alumni Erin Dawicki MBA ‘24 and Michelle Ewy MBA ‘24 speak to Boston 25 about developing LymeAlert, the first at-home test kit to detect Lyme disease in ticks. “The faster you treat it [Lyme disease], the way easier it is to treat and have complete resolution of symptoms for a lot of people,” says Dawicki. “But the second challenge is the current diagnostics we have miss 64 to 78 percent of early-stage cases.”