Skip to content ↓

With peer institutions, MIT files amicus brief against revised travel ban

Ensuring that students and scholars from around the globe can continue to enter the US is vital to universities’ missions, brief argues.

Press Contact:

Kimberly Allen
Phone: 617-253-2702
Fax: 617-258-8762
MIT News Office

Media Download

Download Image

*Terms of Use:

Images for download on the MIT News office website are made available to non-commercial entities, press and the general public under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives license. You may not alter the images provided, other than to crop them to size. A credit line must be used when reproducing images; if one is not provided below, credit the images to "MIT."

Close

MIT and 30 other colleges and universities today filed an amicus brief in the federal appeals court for the Fourth Circuit, arguing that President Trump’s latest executive order, like its predecessor, threatens the universities’ ability to fulfill their educational missions by attracting the most talented individuals from around the world.

This is the third “friend of the court” brief MIT has filed in lawsuits concerning the executive orders restricting travel to the United States for nationals from parts of the Middle East and Africa. The first brief was filed with the federal court in Boston on Feb. 3, and the second was filed with the federal court in the eastern district of New York on Feb. 13.

The executive order issued by the president on March 6, suspends citizens of six Muslim-majority countries — Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen — from entering the U.S. for a period of 90 days. Although the order excludes certain visa-holders, it would bar entry of individuals who seek the categories of visas most commonly relied upon by the universities’ international students, faculty, staff, and scholars.

In their amicus brief, the universities describe how the executive order inflicts significant burdens on their students, faculty, and scholars; impedes the universities’ ability to fulfill their educational missions; and will result in harm to the U.S. economy if American universities cannot attract the best talent to their campuses to study and work.

The brief also argues that the executive order will impede successful academic collaboration in the United States, and that it undercuts efforts to foster a culture of diversity, inclusion, and tolerance, by signaling, from the highest levels of government, that discrimination is not only acceptable but appropriate. 

Amici [the universities] are experiencing the Order’s costs absent any evidence that all or even an appreciable number of nationals from these six countries — all of whom already undergo significant vetting by the government before being permitted to study or work here — pose any threat to the safety or security of the United States or amici’s campuses,” the brief states.

Related Links

Related Topics

Related Articles

More MIT News

Globular blue and white orbs "examining" single-stranded RNA products and marking them with green checks or red x's

Why are some bacterial genes high in purines?

In certain species of bacteria, the answer lies in shielding RNA transcripts from a quality-control factor called Rho. Understanding the requirements for expressible sequences is critical for expression engineering of therapeutic agents.

Read full story

Rich Nielsen, Volha Charnysh, Kevin Dorst, and Emily Richmond Pollock seated at a table, talking

Building a scholarly community

The SHASS Faculty Fellows Program, administered by the MIT Human Insight Collaborative, is fostering new research projects and creating space for supportive and interdisciplinary discussion.

Read full story