• Michael Hecht of MIT's Haystack Observatory will lead development of the MOXIE instrument that will fly on the Mars 2020 mission.

    Michael Hecht of MIT's Haystack Observatory will lead development of the MOXIE instrument that will fly on the Mars 2020 mission.

    Image: Jose-Luis Olivares/MIT

    Full Screen
  • Subsystems on the MOXIE instrument.

    Subsystems on the MOXIE instrument.

    Image: NASA

    Full Screen
  • MOXIE will be one of seven payload instruments on the Mars 2020 rover.

    MOXIE will be one of seven payload instruments on the Mars 2020 rover.

    Image: NASA

    Full Screen
  • The Mars 2020 rover is scheduled to launch in July, 2020.

    The Mars 2020 rover is scheduled to launch in July, 2020.

    Image: NASA

    Full Screen

Going to the Red Planet

An MIT oxygen-creating instrument has been selected to fly on the upcoming Mars 2020 mission.

Press Contact

Kimberly Allen
Email: allenkc@mit.edu
Phone: 617-253-2702
MIT News Office

Media Resources

5 images for download

Access Media

Media can only be downloaded from the desktop version of this website.

Whenever the first NASA astronauts arrive on Mars, they will likely have MIT to thank for the oxygen they breathe — and for the oxygen needed to burn rocket fuel that will launch them back home to Earth.

On Thursday, NASA announced the seven instruments that will accompany Mars 2020, a planned $1.9 billion roving laboratory similar to the Mars Curiosity rover currently cruising the Red Planet. Key among these instruments is an MIT-led payload known as MOXIE, which will play a leading role in paving the way for human exploration of our ruddy planetary neighbor.

MOXIE — short for Mars OXygen In situ resource utilization Experiment — was selected from 58 instrument proposals submitted by research teams around the world. The experiment, currently scheduled to launch in the summer of 2020, is a specialized reverse fuel cell whose primary function is to consume electricity in order to produce oxygen on Mars, where the atmosphere is 96 percent carbon dioxide. If proven to work on the Mars 2020 mission, a MOXIE-like system could later be used to produce oxygen on a larger scale, both for life-sustaining activities for human travelers and to provide liquid oxygen needed to burn the rocket fuel for a return trip to Earth.

“Human exploration of Mars will be a seminal event for the next generation, the same way the moon landing mission was for my generation,” says Michael Hecht, principal investigator of the MOXIE instrument and assistant director for research management at the MIT Haystack Observatory. “I welcome this opportunity to move us closer to that vision.”

An oxygen factory on Mars

One of the main goals of the Mars 2020 mission will be to determine the potential habitability of the planet for human visitors. To that end, the MOXIE instrument will attempt to make oxygen out of native resources in order to demonstrate that it could be done on a larger scale for future missions.

To do this, MOXIE will be designed and built as what Hecht calls a “fuel cell run in reverse.” In a normal fuel cell, fuel is heated together with an oxidizer — often oxygen — producing electricity. In this case, however, electricity produced by a separate machine would be combined with carbon dioxide from the Martian air to produce oxygen and carbon monoxide in a process called solid oxide electrolysis.

“It’s a pretty exotic way to run a fuel cell on Earth,” Hecht says, “but on Mars if you want to run an engine, you don’t have oxygen. Over 75 percent of what you would have to carry to run an engine on Mars would be oxygen.”

Of course, setting up a system to create oxygen that human explorers could breathe would be extremely helpful for a mission of any duration. But there’s an equally important reason to be able to produce oxygen onsite, Hecht says: “When we send humans to Mars, we will want them to return safely, and to do that they need a rocket to lift off the planet. That’s one of the largest pieces of the mass budget that we would need to send astronauts there and back. So if we can eliminate that piece by making the oxygen on Mars, we’re way ahead of the game.”

According to Hecht, a long-term plan for getting humans to Mars — and back — would look something like this: First, a small nuclear reactor would be sent to the Red Planet along with a scaled-up version of the MOXIE instrument. Over a couple of years, its oxygen tank would fill up in preparation for human visitors. Once the crew arrives, “they have their power source, they have their fuel, and the infrastructure for the mission is already in place,” Hecht says. “That’s the piece we’re after.”

Hecht adds that producing oxygen on the Martian surface is likely the simplest solution for a number of reasons. It would, for example, eliminate the difficulty and expense of sending liquid oxygen stores to Mars.

To be sure, MOXIE won’t be the only instrument aboard the Mars 2020 mission. It will occupy valuable space on a rover that will also conduct other important scientific experiments — such as searching the Martian soil for signs of life. So why do scientists and engineers need to demonstrate that they can produce oxygen on the surface, when they’re confident they can make that reaction happen on Earth?  

“If you were one of those astronauts depending on an oxygen tank for your ride home, I think you’d like to see it tested on Mars before you go,” Hecht explains. “We want to invest in a simple prototype before we are convinced. We’ve never run a factory on Mars. But this is what we’re doing; we’re running a prototype factory to see what problems we might come up against.” 

MIT connection

To develop MOXIE, MIT will partner with NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, Calif. JPL will lead design and development of the payload, while MIT will establish the mission architecture, oversee the development, and plan operations on the surface of Mars.

At MIT, MOXIE’s home will be the Haystack Observatory, an interdisciplinary research center in Westford, Mass., that specializes in radio science related to astronomy, atmospheric science, and applied measurement of the Earth known as geodesy. Hecht admits that developing and building the MOXIE instrument will be something of a departure from Haystack’s typical projects, but he and his colleagues are excited to take on the challenge.

“Haystack has been involved in the space program since its inception, even before it was officially Haystack Observatory,” Hecht says. “We really pride ourselves on our ability to pioneer new, ultraprecise scientific instrumentation and get it out into the field. We’re kind of a bridge between an engineering production shop and a fundamental science shop, so this plays to our strength in every way but the fact that there’s no radio science [on Mars 2020].”

Of course, Hecht and his Haystack colleagues won’t be working on MOXIE in a vacuum. The instrument will also benefit from the expertise of Jeff Hoffman, a former astronaut and professor of the practice in MIT’s Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Associate Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering Bilge Yildiz, who has unique experience with the technology that will fly on the MOXIE experiment, will also play an important role.

“It’s a collaboration I never expected, between nuclear engineering, AeroAstro, and Haystack Observatory,” Hecht says. “But in the end, our leadership team ended up with a very competitive product.”

Humans key to future Mars exploration

If all goes according to plan, the Mars 2020 mission, with MOXIE in tow, will launch in July 2020. Assuming a safe landing and deployment, Hecht hopes the MOXIE instrument will transform the future of Martian exploration by demonstrating that humans can live directly off the land, with as few resources as possible shipped in from Earth.

When will humans actually get to Mars? An independent mission known as Mars One aims to send humans on a one-way trip to the Red Planet in 2024 — but critically, the explorers who have signed up for that mission know they won’t be returning. Sending humans on a government-funded return trip will take much more effort, both in terms of science and technology and political will.

“It’s not a science and engineering question, it’s a political and programmatic question,” argues Hecht, who believes it’s not unreasonable to think NASA could launch humans on a return trip to Mars in 20 years. “What that will take is, I’d say, a political bipartisan commitment, a sustained investment, and the best and brightest minds of the generation, just as Apollo did,” Hecht says. “It’s a really challenging project, just as Apollo was. It’s doable, it won’t break the bank in the United States, and we can afford it, but it’s a large commitment.

“I was thinking about [President John F.] Kennedy’s speech,” Hecht adds, “when he talked about going to the moon not because it’s easy, but because it’s hard. And I was really struck by what came after that quote, the part that nobody remembers. He said, ‘Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.’ That just said it. We will get to Mars in 20 years when we are willing to embrace that challenge.”

Topics: Mars, Planetary science, NASA, Haystack Observatory, Research


The July 31 NASA announcement of the 2020 Mars Rover mission refers to MOXIE for converting CO2 to O2. Intrigued and hoping to find a discussion of how this is done, I finally found this page. But it lacks the details. So far, I've discovered that the process involves solid oxide electrolytic cells operating at 500-850°C. But could MIT news provide a link on this page to a recent technical paper on the subject?

Plant some seeds and see if they grow and the trees will produce oxygen, just a thought

Humanity will never achieve great things, if they are not willing to change who they are. When we come together we can grow together. - @TheMarsPreserve

Isn't 2024 10 years and not 20?

All this, and no tip of the hat to Bob Zubrin?  I'm disappointed.

I love this, but why build it on a rover? Their doesn't apear to be any benefit on having it move round the rover frame is heavy and the same job could be done on normal lander.

Back to the top