Dean Anantha Chandrakasan speaks with Kristin Toussaint of Metro about MIT Intelligence Quest. “When you bring together researchers from different disciplines, they end up collaborating and creating something very new that they individually couldn't have created,” said Chandrakasan.
Brian Heater writes for TechCrunch about the new Institute-wide initiative, MIT Intelligence Quest. “Many of the products are moonshoots. They involve teams of scientists and engineers working together. It’s essentially a new model and we need folks and resources behind that,” said Prof. James DiCarlo.
“Intriguing is that [MIT IQ] brings together researchers who study both human intelligence and artificial intelligence. The hope is that better understanding both of them will help develop new algorithms and techniques that can be used broadly,” writes Sean Captain for Fast Company.
MIT is launching a new initiative known as MIT Intelligence Quest, “in an effort to combine multiple disciplines to reverse engineer human intelligence, create new algorithms for machine learning and artificial intelligence and foster collaboration,” writes Larry Dignan for ZDNet.
MIT Intelligence Quest, a new Institute-wide initiative that will advance human and machine intelligence research, “will help connect researchers across disciplines and support projects in which they work together, as well as seek collaborations with industry,” writes Andy Rosen for The Boston Globe.
Prof. Josh Tenenbaum spoke with Bob Oakes on WBUR’s Morning Edition about MIT Intelligence Quest. “This is fundamentally about coupling the basic science of how intelligence works in the human mind and brain, with the quest to engineer new more powerful, more humanlike machines. And to do all of this in service of our mission to make a better world, with a longer-term vision that really only a university like MIT can have,” said Tenenbaum.
Jeff Engel writes for Xconomy about MIT’s ambitions for its newly announced Institute-wide initiative, MIT Intelligence Quest. “If we want A.I. breakthroughs, it’s going to take research in new science. That’s a central inspiration for MIT IQ,” said President Reif.
“The MIT Intelligence Quest or MIT IQ, based at an institution that has been at the forefront of artificial intelligence research since the 1950s, is a far-reaching academic effort to regain the initiative in AI,” writes Clive Cookson for The Financial Times.
Using recent analyses by Prof. Frank Levy, Eduardo Porter of The New York Times explores the notion that AI will eliminate jobs and negatively impact American politics. Prof. Daron Acemoglu suggests that with more employment options in large cities, the backlash “will be more muted than it was when trade took out the jobs of single-industry company towns.”
Graduate student Joy Buolamwini is featured on NPR’s TED Radio Hour explaining the racial bias of facial recognition software and how these problems can be rectified. “The minimum thing we can do is actually check for the performance of these systems across groups that we already know have historically been disenfranchised,” says Buolanwini.
Political science graduate student, Michael Freedman writes in The Washington Post about the increased influence of Israel’s religious political parties. Freedman argues that this change is due to the death of powerful moderate political leaders, and warns that it will become “difficult to build a stable coalition that relies on cooperation between secular and religious parties.”
TechCrunch reporter Devin Coldewey writes about a new game developed by Prof. D Fox Harrell that is aimed at “identifying and navigating the subtleties of sexism” in the workplace.
Lecturer Amy Carleton speaks with Times Higher Ed reporter Holly Else about how she uses Wikipedia in her courses. Carleton explains that by asking students to write new pieces and add information to existing Wikipedia entries, she is attempting to help students “start to understand how important it is to have a high-quality source to back up any statements that they are making.”
Writing for The New York Times, Thomas Edsall highlights research by Profs. Daron Acemoglu and David Autor examining how automation and trade impacted the 2016 presidential election. “The swing to Republicans between 2008 and 2016 is quite a bit stronger in commuting zones most affected by industrial robots,” explains Acemoglu. “You don’t see much of the impact of robots in prior presidential elections.”
With virtual personal assistants becoming more commonplace, Research Affiliate Jimena Canales suggests in an NPR article that it may be time to reconsider our views of them. Despite knowing that AI is not real, “the boundary between the simulated and the real is as contested as it ever was,” she writes.