With peer institutions, MIT files amicus brief against revised travel ban

Ensuring that students and scholars from around the globe can continue to enter the US is vital to universities’ missions, brief argues.


Press Contact

Kimberly Allen
Email: allenkc@mit.edu
Phone: 617-253-2702
MIT News Office

Media Resources

1 images for download

Access Media

Media can only be downloaded from the desktop version of this website.

MIT and 30 other colleges and universities today filed an amicus brief in the federal appeals court for the Fourth Circuit, arguing that President Trump’s latest executive order, like its predecessor, threatens the universities’ ability to fulfill their educational missions by attracting the most talented individuals from around the world.

This is the third “friend of the court” brief MIT has filed in lawsuits concerning the executive orders restricting travel to the United States for nationals from parts of the Middle East and Africa. The first brief was filed with the federal court in Boston on Feb. 3, and the second was filed with the federal court in the eastern district of New York on Feb. 13.

The executive order issued by the president on March 6, suspends citizens of six Muslim-majority countries — Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen — from entering the U.S. for a period of 90 days. Although the order excludes certain visa-holders, it would bar entry of individuals who seek the categories of visas most commonly relied upon by the universities’ international students, faculty, staff, and scholars.

In their amicus brief, the universities describe how the executive order inflicts significant burdens on their students, faculty, and scholars; impedes the universities’ ability to fulfill their educational missions; and will result in harm to the U.S. economy if American universities cannot attract the best talent to their campuses to study and work.

The brief also argues that the executive order will impede successful academic collaboration in the United States, and that it undercuts efforts to foster a culture of diversity, inclusion, and tolerance, by signaling, from the highest levels of government, that discrimination is not only acceptable but appropriate. 

Amici [the universities] are experiencing the Order’s costs absent any evidence that all or even an appreciable number of nationals from these six countries — all of whom already undergo significant vetting by the government before being permitted to study or work here — pose any threat to the safety or security of the United States or amici’s campuses,” the brief states.


Topics: Administration, Community, Policy, International initiatives, International relations, President L. Rafael Reif, Law, Middle East

Back to the top