• Artist's rendering of TESS in orbit

    Artist's rendering of TESS in orbit

    Illustration: Chet Beals/MIT Lincoln Lab

    Full Screen

NASA selects MIT-led TESS project for 2017 mission

Artist's rendering of TESS in orbit

$200 million project will launch telescopes to perform full-sky search for transiting exoplanets.

Press Contact

Kimberly Allen
Email: allenkc@mit.edu
Phone: 617-253-2702
MIT News Office

Media Resources

1 images for download

Access Media

Media can only be downloaded from the desktop version of this website.

Following a three-year competition, NASA has selected the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) project at MIT for a planned launch in 2017. The space agency announced the mission — to be funded by a $200 million grant to the MIT-led team — this afternoon.

TESS team partners include the MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research (MKI) and MIT Lincoln Laboratory; NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center; Orbital Sciences Corporation; NASA’s Ames Research Center; the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; The Aerospace Corporation; and the Space Telescope Science Institute.

The project, led by principal investigator George Ricker, a senior research scientist at MKI, will use an array of wide-field cameras to perform an all-sky survey to discover transiting exoplanets, ranging from Earth-sized planets to gas giants, in orbit around the brightest stars in the sun’s neighborhood.

An exoplanet is a planet orbiting a star other than the sun; a transiting exoplanet is one that periodically eclipses its host star.

“TESS will carry out the first space-borne all-sky transit survey, covering 400 times as much sky as any previous mission,” Ricker says. “It will identify thousands of new planets in the solar neighborhood, with a special focus on planets comparable in size to the Earth.”

TESS relies upon a number of innovations developed by the MIT team over the past seven years. “For TESS, we were able to devise a special new ‘Goldilocks’ orbit for the spacecraft — one which is not too close, and not too far, from both the Earth and the moon,” Ricker says.

As a result, every two weeks TESS approaches close enough to the Earth for high data-downlink rates, while remaining above the planet’s harmful radiation belts. This special orbit will remain stable for decades, keeping TESS’s sensitive cameras in a very stable temperature range.

With TESS, it will be possible to study the masses, sizes, densities, orbits and atmospheres of a large cohort of small planets, including a sample of rocky worlds in the habitable zones of their host stars. TESS will provide prime targets for further characterization by the James Webb Space Telescope, as well as other large ground-based and space-based telescopes of the future.

TESS project members include Ricker; Josh Winn, an associate professor of physics at MIT; and Sara Seager, a professor of planetary science and physics at MIT.

“We’re very excited about TESS because it’s the natural next step in exoplanetary science,” Winn says.  

“The selection of TESS has just accelerated our chances of finding life on another planet within the next decade,” Seager adds.  

MKI research scientists Roland Vanderspek and Joel Villasenor will serve as deputy principal investigator and payload scientist, respectively. Principal research scientist Alan Levine serves as a co-investigator. Tony Smith of Lincoln Lab will manage the TESS payload effort, Lincoln Lab will develop the optical cameras and custom charge-coupled devices required by the mission.

“NASA’s Explorer Program gives us a wonderful opportunity to carry out forefront space science with a relatively small university-based group and on a time scale well-matched to the rapidly evolving field of extrasolar planets,” says Jackie Hewitt, a professor of physics and director of the Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research. “At MIT, TESS has the involvement of faculty and research staff of the Kavli Institute, the Department of Physics, and the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, so we will be actively engaging students in this exciting work.”

Previous sky surveys with ground-based telescopes have mainly picked out giant exoplanets. NASA’s Kepler spacecraft has recently uncovered the existence of many smaller exoplanets, but the stars Kepler examines are faint and difficult to study. In contrast, TESS will examine a large number of small planets around the very brightest stars in the sky.

“The TESS legacy will be a catalog of the nearest and brightest main-sequence stars hosting transiting exoplanets, which will forever be the most favorable targets for detailed investigations,” Ricker said.

The other mission selected today by NASA is the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER). It will be mounted on the International Space Station and measure the variability of cosmic X-ray sources, a process called X-ray timing, to explore the exotic states of matter within neutron stars and reveal their interior and surface compositions. NICER’s principal investigator is Keith Gendreau of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. The MKI group, lead by Ricker, is also a partner in the NICER mission.

“The Explorer Program has a long and stellar history of deploying truly innovative missions to study some of the most exciting questions in space science,” John Grunsfeld, NASA’s associate administrator for science, said in the space agency’s statement today. “With these missions we will learn about the most extreme states of matter by studying neutron stars and we will identify many nearby star systems with rocky planets in the habitable zone for further study by telescopes such as the James Webb Space Telescope.”

The Explorer Program is NASA’s oldest continuous program and has launched more than 90 missions. It began in 1958 with the Explorer 1, which discovered the Earth’s radiation belts. Another Explorer mission, the Cosmic Background Explorer, led to a Nobel Prize. NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center manages the program for the agency’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington.

Topics: Kavli Institute, NASA, Space exploration, Space, astronomy and planetary science, Satellites, Awards, honors and fellowships, Exoplanets, Earth and atmospheric sciences, Lincoln Laboratory, Physics, TESS


Research is the holy grail of education, not so much for what is learned as for additional income and scholarly bragging rights. The catch-all excuse for spending hundreds of billions of dollars of public money worldwide is simply, "You never know where your research will take you."

To a first order of magnitude, yes, yes we do.

1. It puts lots of money in academic coffers. These same academics who line their pockets with government grants, and then speakers' fees are only too quick to cry "foul" and claim that you should "follow the oil company money" on all things global warming.

2. Initial research is always - always followed by "More research must be done." At considerably additional expense, of course.

3. Failure to achieve anything consequential is never a deterrent to ask for more, more, much more.

If academics had to spend their own money to do all their research, it would essentially evaporate.

The search for ET is a sham. I will explain why in the following comment.

Finding extraterrestrial life has already wasted many tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars - money which might have been used for other, far more worthwhile endeavors. To name but a few, "feeding the hungry," "housing the homeless," "providing medical care to those in need."

Notwithstanding the utter failure to hear a whisper from ET, the breathless effort continues, undeterred in the slightest. Why? Other People's Money, mostly.

Nobel prize-winner, Francis Crick, gave his scientific opinion that life is almost impossible, such is its complexity.

What could we possibly do with ET beyond talk to him? Not even that.

Fellow humans from just a few thousand years ago couldn't even talk to us through heiroglyphics until they were deciphered with the Rosetta Stone.

What good would finding algae on a distant planet possibly do us?

Cost/benefit analysis is meaningless to academics.

Back to the top