Technology and society

CNN reporter Hadas Gold meets with Prof. Adam Berinsky and Prof. Chara Podimata to learn more about their new tool that tracks how popular AI chatbots source their information and respond to questions related to the midterm elections. “Even if people do not necessarily say that they trust AI, they like what AI gives them, which is a single answer,” says Berinsky. “What worries me is that the average voter, someone who might know a little about politics, but doesn’t know the details, is going to get this definitive answer [from an AI chatbot] that might be based on a different stew of information.”

Prof. John Urschel speaks to The New Yorker’s Rivka Galchen about AI being used as a tool for teaching and research in the field of mathematics. “I would say what I call the more scientist approach [to new technology] is being focused on trying to push the frontier of things as far as we can as quickly as we can,” says Urschel. “And the artist perspective is, ‘let me do something beautiful and enjoyable and manipulate these things,’ and the act of doing this is really, you know, a joyful thing.” 

Writing for Forbes, alumnus Paul Hsieh discusses radiologists employing rapidly evolving AI tools to help deliver diagnoses. “Radiologists are willing to employ AI tools that have been statistically validated to provide reliable diagnoses, even if we don’t yet fully understand how those tools work,” writes Hsieh. “But radiologists are not content to stop there. We also continually seek to improve genuine human understanding of how AI works in our field as a matter of professional responsibility for ourselves and for our patients.”  

CodeSignal, co-founded by alumnus and CEO Tigran Sloyan, has developed Agentic Skills Intelligence, a new product that “uses AI agents to evaluate the skills people use in their work and links the findings to personalized practice,” writes Forbes’ Ray Ravaglia. CodeSignal has built an AI agent “for each domain in its job taxonomy, such as engineering and sales, along with agents for capabilities that cut across jobs, among them communication and AI literacy,” notes Ravaglia. “The agents draw on systems including Gong, Salesforce, and GitHub, and they score what they find against rubrics the company says are grounded in industrial-organizational psychology.” 

Principal Research Scientist Deepjyoti Deka speaks to MassLive’s Tréa Lavery about the type of information stored by data centers. “Anything, mostly, that you are using the computer for, that you are getting some information from, is housed in a data center,” says Deka. “A lot of it is active data handling, but some of it is also data storage.” 

Prof. Sanjay Sarma speaks to Bloomberg’s Saritha Rai about the difficulty of developing dexterous robots for use in the home versus developing factory machines for use in standardized plants. “Heavy work, hazardous tasks have long been the focus of automation,” says Sarma. “Robots seem to be following an evolutionary path–the finer the motor or cognitive skills required, the harder to automate.”  

Writing for Fortune, MIT Innovation Fellow David Siegel SM ’86, PhD ’91, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld and Stephen Henriques examine the timeline of the current investment boom in AI infrastructure. “The market may already have overbuilt relative to the payback window that data center financing assumes. Much of what corporate America spends on AI today funds exploratory pilots,” Siegel, Sonnenfeld and Henriques note. “A pullback to reassess is not only the likely next step, but a healthy one.”  

Prof. Ryan Williams speaks to TechCrunch’s Tim Fernholz about AI platforms refuting the Exponential Time Hypothesis, part of a broader class of problems known as P versus NP. “I do think that it kind of calls into question a lot of the intuitions that we thought we had about … how tractable [hard NP problems] are. I also think that this is probably not the final answer either,” says Williams. AI is “forcing people to be a little more ambitious about the kind of work that they do, and to think more deeply about, okay, if all the things I used to work on are now low-hanging fruit for AI, how can I raise the bar for the kind of scientific questions I want to ask?” 

Prof. Gary Gensler speaks with “Bloomberg Surveillance” hosts Tom Keene and Paul Sweeney about how the current AI investment boom may impact the U.S. economy. “You can be positive about the technology and still say our capital markets tend to overfund in exuberance,” says Gensler. “I think that we will have a deceleration of this AI boom, and then some form of a reversal in the next 18 to 30 months. And the question really, to me, is a little bit about timing: when and then how deep it [the deceleration] is. I think the depth of it is going to be dependent on how much debt is in the system, where it is [and] who holds it.”  

Live on GBH’s “The Curiosity Desk,” hosted by Edgar B. Herwick III, Prof. Adam Berinsky joins Boston Globe reporter Aaron Pressman and Kate Gage from the Cooperative Lab Project for a conversation about the impact of AI on the 2026 midterm elections. Berinsky notes that in the runup to the midterms, voters “need to be careful about what they are paying attention to. I think we want to separate out what is new to AI and what is just communication in general,” says Berinsky. “In elections where margins are tens of thousands of votes in states that can determine the presidency, even really small effects matter.”  

The Boston Globe’s Mark Feeney spotlights the “Bounce juggler (W.C. Fields),” a machine modeled after the comedian W.C. Fields, on display at the MIT Museum, that juggles three metal balls and was created by the late Prof. Claude Shannon SM ’40, PhD ’40. “It’s one thing to be known as ‘the father of information theory,’ as Shannon is. His work in mathematics, electrical engineering, cryptography, and computer science was that important,” writes Feeney. “But Shannon was also a chess player, unicyclist, juggler, and inventor. Shannon combined his talent for engineering and imagination with his love of humor and juggling in the ‘Bounce juggler.’”  

In an interview with The Boston Globe’s Rebecca Spiess, Prof. Eric So discusses how AI affects different areas of human cognition, as detailed in his new book “The Collision: What AI Does to Us.” “So many people these days are just really focused on the productivity benefits of AI and what it can do for us. I think what people really should be thinking about is what AI is doing to us in the immediate term,” says So. “AI is changing who we are as thinkers, right now, in our day-to-day lives; in classrooms; in households; in boardrooms across the globe.” 

Prof. Tod Machover’s composition “already and not yet,” was performed by members of the Boston Symphony Orchestra along with an AI system that listens to musicians and adds improvisations, reports A.Z. Madonna for The Boston Globe. “Music is something that’s meant to plumb your soul, and have you discover things,” says Machover. The composition is “about my view of where we are, how to take a deep breath and figure out, gather strength to go somewhere else, and then what a possible future of democracy might be.”  

Prof. Tod Machover speaks to WBUR’s Andrea Shea about “already and not yet” an interactive composition he wrote for the Boston Symphony Orchestra and an AI instrument developed by Machover and graduate student Manaswi Mishra. Machover explains that they designed the AI tools so that they’re “always going to make a kind of variation, a coloration, an extension of what the musician's playing – but exactly what it's going to do I do not have complete control over. I'm trying to show that it [AI] can be integrated in a beautiful, provocative and interesting way in a serious piece of music.”  

Prof. Daron Acemoglu joins “The Claman Countdown” on Fox Business to discuss the possibility that largescale deployment of AI could triple unemployment within the next decade. “There is so much uncertainty about AI,” says Acemoglu. “It’s very difficult to know exactly when we’re going to see the productivity gains, which will come, and when we’re going to see job losses, and whether we’ll actually see some job creation as well. But on the current path where AI is being prepared and developed as a labor replacing technology, I would be very worried that within the next ten years we’ll see a lot of jobs disappear.”