• (Left to right) Israel Ruiz, MIT executive vice president and treasurer; MIT President L. Rafael Reif; Bob Reynolds, CEO of Putnam Investments; and Scott Blackmun, CEO of the United States Olympic Committee (USOC).

    (Left to right) Israel Ruiz, MIT executive vice president and treasurer; MIT President L. Rafael Reif; Bob Reynolds, CEO of Putnam Investments; and Scott Blackmun, CEO of the United States Olympic Committee (USOC).

    Dominick Reuter

    Full Screen
  • Dominick Reuter

    Full Screen
  • Larry Probst, chair of the USOC.

    Larry Probst, chair of the USOC.

    Dominick Reuter

    Full Screen
  • John Fish, chairman and CEO of Suffolk Construction Company, leading the US Olympic bid effort.

    John Fish, chairman and CEO of Suffolk Construction Company, leading the US Olympic bid effort.

    Dominick Reuter

    Full Screen
  • Boston Mayor Marty Walsh at the podium.

    Boston Mayor Marty Walsh at the podium.

    Dominick Reuter

    Full Screen
  • The Berklee College of Music Choir performs.

    The Berklee College of Music Choir performs.

    Dominick Reuter

    Full Screen

3 Questions: Israel Ruiz on MIT’s role in Boston’s 2024 Olympics bid

Shirts with the Boston 2024 logo.

The U.S. Olympic Committee visits Boston; city is one of four U.S. contenders.


Press Contact

Kimberly Allen
Email: allenkc@mit.edu
Phone: 617-253-2702
MIT News Office

Media Resources

7 images for download

Access Media

Media can only be downloaded from the desktop version of this website.

Today, the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) visited Boston. Israel Ruiz, MIT’s executive vice president and treasurer, serves as one of four co-chairs — along with Katie Lapp, Harvard University’s executive vice president; Gloria Larson, president of Bentley University; and Robert Caret, president of the University of Massachusetts at Boston — of the Boston 2024 Institutional Outreach Subcommittee, a group that is working to engage universities across Massachusetts in support of Boston’s bid. He spoke with MIT News about the Institute’s role in the city’s Olympics bid.

Q. Why did the USOC come to Boston today?

A. Boston is one of four American cities — along with Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington — vying to become the United States Olympic Committee’s (USOC) nominee to host the summer Olympics and Paralympic Games in 2024. Today, Boston hosted the USOC, with meetings at MIT’s Media Lab in the morning and the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in the afternoon — the last such meeting to be held in Boston before the USOC decides among the four cities in January.  

MIT President L. Rafael Reif offered welcoming remarks as the meeting opened this morning. Gov. Deval Patrick, Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, and the presidents of the University of Massachusetts at Boston, Northeastern, Tufts, and Bentley also participated in the day’s events.

This was an opportunity for Boston to showcase itself as a center of innovation with a passion for sport, and for members of the U.S. Olympic Committee to experience the city and see firsthand the possibility for a walkable Olympic games with great international appeal.

Of particular interest to me is that there is a movement to develop financially sustainable approaches to hosting the games, so that cities can afford to continue the great traditions of the Olympics. I believe that MIT — along with other higher education institutions across the Boston region — has much to contribute to this discussion. We have the opportunity to do things differently, and to chart a new approach to hosting the games for future generations.

Q. How does the bid process work, and what are the next steps in the selection process?

A. Each of the four U.S. applicant cities competing to host the summer Olympics in 2024 must submit a proposal describing plans for key venues — sporting events, the stadium, and “Olympic village” — along with plans for transportation and security; public support; and financing for the games. This first phase of the bid process lasts six months, with the cities’ final proposals due in December.

The Boston 2024 Partnership is a nonprofit organization formed to prepare the bid materials. The group is governed by a 36-member executive committee, and has launched a series of subcommittees aimed at master planning, fundraising, outreach, and engagement. As co-chair of the Institutional Outreach Subcommittee, I am a member of the executive committee.

The U.S. Olympic Committee is expected to select an applicant city in mid-January, and the successful city will go on to compete internationally to host the games. This second phase of the bid process is 2 1/2 years in duration; announcement of the final host city is expected in summer 2017. Once selected, the host city then has seven years to prepare for the games, which will take place in the summer of 2024.

Q. What is MIT’s role in Boston’s bid to host the 2024 Olympics?

A. MIT was invited to participate as part of the overall university engagement for the games. The Institutional Outreach Committee that I serve on is helping to engage people from universities across Massachusetts, and we are imagining possibilities for K-12 outreach around sport, health, and wellness; youth engagement around community service; and programs for Olympic athletes to return to Boston for educational experiences after the games. MIT has had a number of students that have competed as Olympic athletes for a range of countries, with nine alumni receiving Olympic medals.

We also foresee faculty engagement around innovation. Professor Carlo Ratti of MIT’s Department of Urban Studies and Planning and his colleagues from the Senseable City Lab have been talking with the Boston 2024 team about opportunities to use real-time urban data, such as cellphone network information, to better understand urban flows and patterns of activity. Using mobility patterns to reveal unused capacity in the transportation infrastructure could inform planning and help to achieve a walkable Olympics, complemented by appropriate transportation infrastructure.

One thing we talk a great deal about is the potential legacy of the Boston games, and the possibilities for positive impact on the city and surrounding areas. If the Olympics come to Boston, we are likely to see improvements to transportation infrastructure, such as increased capacity on the Red Line, which would be great for Cambridge, the Kendall Square area, and MIT.

One of the strengths of the Boston area is the vast number of universities located in very close proximity — meaning that there are tremendous opportunities for student engagement and volunteerism. Dean for Student Life Chris Colombo is collaborating with student affairs officers from other universities to consider these opportunities. I, myself, was a student volunteer during the 1992 summer Olympics in Barcelona, and it was a thrilling experience that I will never forget. The games had an amazing impact on the city, and the rejuvenation was wonderful to watch.

Director of Athletics Julie Soriero is engaging with us to imagine how MIT might contribute to the games; the Institute offers one of the broadest intercollegiate athletics programs in the world, with 33 varsity sports overall. If Boston is successful and is ultimately selected as the host city, we are pursuing possibilities for MIT to provide the sporting venues for archery and fencing.

MIT has a long history of achievement in archery and in men’s and women’s fencing, with athletes receiving accolades for exceptional academic achievement as well as athleticism: Our head coach for men’s fencing, Jarek Koniusz, was coached by the current U.S. Olympic team coach, Ed Korfanty. And freshman Jin Kim was a member of both the 2014 USA Archery and USA Junior Archery teams.


Topics: 3 Questions, MIT Administration, Community, Special events and guest speakers, Sports, Athletics, Cambridge, Boston and region

Comments

This would be awesome!

The olympics bring massive disruption and leave behind a disaster in their wake. Krakow just voted to withdraw its bid for the 2022 winter olympics; Boston should do likewise.

I think it would be a waste.

Although it would be an achievement, I would rather the Olympics stay out of Boston.
Traffic is still a nightmare despite the "improvements" the Big Dig supposedly brought, and just where are you going to build the venues??? And the athletes village?

If the city is able to leverage the open dorms in the colleges that will be vacant during the time of the games, and they come up with a strong plan to re-purpose the athletic facilities after the games are over, this is one of the best things that can happen to Boston. The majority of the expenditures are funded privately and Boston's outdated and underfunded infrastructure gets a badly needed upgrade that will last for decades after the games have ended. It is rumored that the Olympic village would be built over at the old Bayside Expo center which could then be handed over to UMass Boston who is in desperate need of dorms but doesn't have the funding capable of building something on that scale.

Back to the top